The independent resource on global security

14. Conventional arms control


Overview, Ian Davis [PDF]

I. International humanitarian law: ICRC guidance and its application in urban warfare, Ian Anthony [PDF]

II. Humanitarian arms control regimes: key developments in 2016, Ian Davis, Vincent Boulanin, Mark Bromley, Lina Grip and Maaike Verbruggen [PDF]

III. A relaunch of conventional arms control in Europe?, Ian Anthony [PDF]

ICRC guidance and its application in urban warfare

The Geneva conventions are an international benchmark for behaviour during armed conflict. In 2011 the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) initiated a multi-year project to update a series of Commentaries that provide guidance to states on how to interpret and implement the conventions. The first update is on the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, and is part of a series of Commentaries that will consider changes in the nature of armed conflict. One of the most important issues addressed in the updated Commentary is how to apply the Geneva conventions to non-international armed conflicts. Other key issues are how to safeguard the impartiality of humanitarian relief, attacks on health care workers and the increasing use of military force and violence in populated areas.


Humanitarian arms control

The use of explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) is a growing concern of the ICRC, among others, and has also featured in ongoing humanitarian arms control efforts. In 2016 close to 42 000 civilians were reported killed or injured by explosive weapons, and the bombardment of Aleppo was the nadir of this form of warfare. The 1981 Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW Convention), in particular, was designed to protect civilians and combatants in situations of armed conflict, but the Fifth Review Conference to update the Convention failed to effectively address issues related to EWIPA, incendiary weapons and new technology in warfare. However, ongoing attempts to expand the scope of the existing humanitarian arms control regimes included discussions on lethal autonomous weapon systems and some fledgling efforts by the outgoing US Administration to regulate the international transfer and use of armed unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, or drones) and to increase transparency on their use. In addition, states met to discuss implementation of the United Nations Programme of Action on small arms and light weapons (SALW) and agreed strong language on the gendered aspects of SALW proliferation and violence, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals.


Conventional arms control in Europe

Europe is the only region that has created an integrated conventional arms control system. There is a consensus, however, that this framework, which was created in the 1990s, no longer delivers the results expected of it. The deep divisions between Russia and the West over causality were played out during discussions within the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) in 2016. Nonetheless, following a German-led initiative, the OSCE agreed to launch a structured dialogue on current and future challenges and risks to security in the OSCE area, with a particular focus on conventional arms control.

Dr Ian Anthony, Dr Ian Davis , Dr Vincent Boulanin, Dr Mark Bromley, Dr Lina Grip and Maaike Verbruggen