The independent resource on global security

SIPRI Policy Briefs

Strangers Across the Amu River: Community Perceptions Along the Tajik–Afghan Borders

While securing a total of 2387 kilometre river-border from the potential trespassing of traffickers, extremists and terrorists forms part of the national security agendas of Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, for the border communities living along the Amu Darya and Panj rivers, concerns stem not just from these traditional threats but from broader aspects of human insecurity: access to decent livelihoods, quality healthcare and education, and adequate water for irrigation. These everyday challenges require a rethink of the question of border security.

Managing Conflict and Integration in the South Caucasus: A Challenge for the European Union

Parallel extra-regional integration projects in the South Caucasus culminated in June 2014 with Georgia’s conclusion of an European Union (EU) Association Agreement and in January 2015 with Armenia’s accession to the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union. Azerbaijan remains outside either project. The implementation of these projects risks an increase in regional fragmentation and a further destabilization of the South Caucasus, notably the protracted conflicts of Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh and South Ossetia.

Peacekeepers Under Threat? Fatality Trends in UN Peace Operations

It is often claimed that contemporary United Nations peace operations perform their functions in increasingly dangerous environments and are therefore more likely to suffer casualties than in previous years. Yet the data on deaths among UN peacekeepers between 1990 and 2015 indicates that fatalities have not become more frequent, neither in absolute terms nor, especially, in relative terms.

The European Union’s Principled Neutrality on the East China Sea

This Policy Brief discusses the role that the European Union (EU) could play to support crisis management and international law solutions in the East China Sea. The current EU approach can be described as ‘principled neutrality’. On the one hand, it has no position on sovereignty issues, but on the other, it supports crisis management and international law solutions (at the general level of principled declarations).

Building Trust between China and Japan: Lessons Learned from Bilateral Interactions in the East China Sea

China–Japan relations have continued to deteriorate since the Diaoyu Islands crisis in September 2012 and have remained at a low point since the normalization of diplomatic ties in 1972. However, the four points of principled agreement reached at the end of 2014 have ignited expectations that relations can be stabilized and improved.

Crisis Management in the East China Sea

Despite their differing views on territory and history, China and Japan have resumed talks on crisis management in the East China Sea. Nonetheless, the diverging views on freedom of navigation and overflight pose a fundamental challenge to crisis management. China and Japan need to agree to a hotline between naval staff officers in charge of operations and to regular staff talks. Elements of the 1972 International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGS) and the 2014 Code for Unplanned Encounters at Sea (CUES) should form the basis of a common code of conduct.

Confrontation and Cooperation in the East China Sea: Chinese Perspectives

In 2014 tension in the East China Sea has been characterized as being significantly reduced. In addition, a meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the November 2014 Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Beijing marked the re-establishment of top-level bilateral exchanges between China and Japan. Based on a four-point principled agreement, both sides announced in January 2015 that they intended to launch a maritime and air crisis management mechanism as soon as possible.

Subscribe to SIPRI Policy Briefs