|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Welcome to the June 2008 issue of SIPRI Update: Global Security & Arms Control. This monthly newsletter will be your source for the latest developments in international security, arms control, non-proliferation and conflict, including recent SIPRI activities and publications. In this issue: |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Jean-Yves Haine, Senior Researcher, SIPRI Ireland’s ‘No’ vote in the referendum on the European Union’s Lisbon Treaty is certain to dominate France’s six-month Presidency of the EU, which starts in July. But while the vote is certainly a setback for the planned development of the EU, the failure (or at least the delay) of the treaty has opened up new opportunities for enhanced cooperation on security and defence by EU members. By rejecting the Lisbon Treaty, Ireland has plunged the EU into a serious crisis. The fears expressed by those who voted ‘No’ were only remotely related to the treaty, but its incomprehensible text would have discouraged even the most ardent supporter of Europe. The President of the European Commission, José Manuel Barroso, backed by France and Germany, has stated that the ratification process will continue and the British Foreign Secretary, David Milliband, has insisted that the treaty will be debated in the British Parliament this week. Meanwhile, President Václav Klaus of the Czech Republic, which will hold the EU Presidency in the first half of 2009, has declared the treaty dead. The debate on the reform of EU institutions that was launched in 2001 is now back to square one. Since the Lisbon Treaty, the result of intense and painful negotiations in 2007 to find a substitute for the failed 2004 Constitutional Treaty, was already a Plan B, there is no obvious way out of this crisis—the only option that can be excluded seems to be a full renegotiation. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
SIPRI Research Associate Mark Bromley gave an assessment of the latest trends in military spending in South America in The Economist and spoke on the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports to Euronews. SIPRI Researcher Vitaly Fedchenko commented on Iran’s nuclear technology developments and its international obligations and Russian military capabilities in interviews with Nezavisimaya Gazeta (in Russian). SIPRI Guest Researcher Tim Foxley opined on the recent international donor conference for Afghanistan in the Middle East Times. SIPRI Director Bates Gill assessed China’s growing international clout in the International Herald Tribune, and its military and nuclear weapons capability in Dagens Nyheter (in Swedish). SIPRI Research Associate Catalina Perdomo shared her views on regional trends in armaments and military expenditure in Latin America with El Colombiano and Radio France Internationale (in Spanish). SIPRI Project Leader Ekaterina Stepanova discussed the latest situation in Iraq and prospects for a more inclusive and representative Iraqi government in an interview with Reuters. SIPRI Researcher Pieter Wezeman commented on military relations between Iran and Syria to Reuters. SIPRI Project Leader Siemon Wezeman gave an assessment of corruption in the global arms trade in an interview with the Finnish MTV3. Figures from the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database and the SIPRI Military Expenditure Database were cited in Defense News, World Politics Review, AllAfrica, The Economic Times, Venezuelanalysis, Welt (in German), and Vedomosti (in Russian), among many others. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
June 2008 marks the 10th anniversary of the European Union Code of Conduct on Arms Exports. This new SIPRI Policy Paper examines the impact of the EU Code over its first 10 years via a close examination of three middle-ranking arms exporters: the Czech Republic, Spain and the Netherlands. The picture that emerges is of a dynamic agreement in which smaller member states have had a strong hand in pushing developments forward. The author gathered much of the evidence for how the Code of Conduct works in practice directly from the officials who implement it and the politicians and campaigners who monitor their decisions. His detailed study of the mechanisms of development and implementation of the Code of Conduct allows him to present recommendations for how it could be strengthened and made to function more effectively. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
The SIPRI Yearbook is a compendium of data and analysis in the areas of
Highlights of the 39th edition include special studies on
along with coverage of developments during 2007 in
SIPRI Yearbook 2008 also has extensive annexes on arms control and disarmament agreements, international organizations and intergovernmental bodies, and a chronology of events during 2007 in the area of security and arms control. Click here for SIPRI Yearbook 2008 ordering details. |
||||||||||||||||
|
For information on SIPRI’s other recent and forthcoming books, visit the SIPRI Publications website, books.sipri.org Other recent publications by SIPRI authors Vitaly Fedchenko, ‘Verifying North Korea’s declaration’, Jane’s Intelligence Review, June 2008, p. 10. Read this article here (requires subscription) Bates Gill, ‘Debating China’s future: inside out’, China Security, vol. 4, no. 2 (spring 2008), pp. 12–13. Read this article here Chin-hao Huang, ‘US–China relations and Darfur’, Fordham International Law Journal, vol. 31, no. 4 (April 2008), pp. 827–42. Read this article here (requires subscription) |
||||||||||||||||
| © SIPRI 2008. ISSN 1654-8264. Contact SIPRI by email: sipri@sipri.org; telephone: +46 8/655 97 00; fax: +46 8/655 97 33; or post: SIPRI, Signalistgatan 9, SE-169 70 Solna, Sweden, or visit us online at www.sipri.org | ||||||||||||||||
| If you would like to subscribe to SIPRI Update, click here to send a message to SIPRI Update—type ‘subscribe’ in the subject line and include your email address. |